Monetary Policy – Now pushing on a piece of string?
There is a growing body of opinion in financial markets that the potency of monetary policy is diminishing and cannot be relied upon as the sole policy tool to revive the global economy. It is inarguable that emergency interest rate settings and the expansion of money supply by Central Bank bond buying programs, helped rescue the global economy from a deep recession. It has been 8 years now since the GFC however, and the economic impact of monetary stimulus appears to be ever diminishing. With economic growth rates still tepid in most developed economies, it is questionable whether further monetary stimulus from here, will have any material beneficial impact on economic growth and by extension, company profits.
What is clear is that equity and bond markets have benefitted enormously from these measures and have now become accustomed to the very easy liquidity measures that are maintaining prices at current levels. The problem that markets must confront over the next couple of years is that this level of stimulus cannot continue in perpetuity. Quantitative easing measures must first be gradually withdrawn, and then interest rates must eventually increase, albeit gradually. Both of these factors have commenced in the US and other countries will eventually follow suit. Central Banks in the UK, Europe and Japan are continuing apace with QE measures and interest rates are still falling in most western economies including Australia. While they are all lagging the US in terms of their timetable, it is inevitable that they will follow suit in coming years.
Is fiscal stimulus the answer?
A popular theme in the financial media is that governments should take advantage of the current low bond yields, and borrow to fund spending in areas such as infrastructure to stimulate economic growth. While this sounds intuitively appealing, governments historically have been terribly inefficient at managing these sort of programs, leaving them only more indebted and placing their budgets under more pressure to service future interest obligations. History tells us that governments are notoriously poor at making the tough decisions necessary to reduce budget deficits. In Australia, we saw the wasteful and ill fated “school halls” and “pink batts” programs while in the US, President Obama’s much heralded investment in “shovel ready projects” produced very little in terms of economic stimulus and escalated the level of government debt which now sits at $US 20 trillion. While monetary policy still has an important role to play, the solutions for governments are not politically easy
Storm clouds are gathering for Markets
The adjustment process to “normalise interest rates” could well be a painful one for markets as any increase in the risk free rate of return as represented by bond yields, will filter through to the valuation of all other financial assets including shares and property. To offset the impact of this, the market must be confident that profit growth will be sufficient to offset the negative valuation impact of higher bond yields to maintain equity prices at current levels. Therein lies the problem for equity markets; there has been a complete absence of profit growth in aggregate in recent times. For example, quarterly profits in the US have actually fallen for the past 2 years. While lower energy prices have contributed heavily to this outcome, the market is becoming increasingly impatient for actual profit growth delivery, especially from top line revenue expansion.